Archives
I'm proud of my name. My wife will tell you that I am somehow convinced that all Willetts we run across must be relatives of mine. I realize that's probably stretching it a bit, but I was told as a child that some genealogical researcher or other had made pretty much that claim, with a tale (an improbable one, it now seems to me) of an old man named Willett, last of that name, with no heirs, who adopted and raised a boy as his own son; that boy then took the name Willett in honor of the old man, and all Willetts since are descendants of that boy.Yeah, I know, I said it seems improbable to me ...
Posted by Edward Willett at 5:13, July 6th, 2008 under Blog |
I'm proud of my name. My wife will tell you that I am somehow convinced that all Willetts we run across must be relatives of mine. I realize that's probably stretching it a bit, but I was told as a child that some genealogical researcher or other had made pretty much that claim, with a tale (an improbable one, it now seems to me) of an old man named Willett, last of that name, with no heirs, who adopted and raised a boy as his own son; that boy then took the name Willett in honor of the old man, and all Willetts since are descendants of that boy.Yeah, I know, I said it seems improbable to me ...
Posted by Edward Willett at 23:13, July 5th, 2008 under Blog |
I have a confession to make: although born in the United States, I’m lousy at that country’s national pastime. I hit not, neither do I catch. If I had a dollar for every fly ball I dropped as kid, I could buy...well, a baseball glove, probably, but what would be the point?So this week I was
pleased to discover that there are solid scientific grounds for missing easy pop flies, and they have nothing...well, very little...to do with a complete lack of skill and/or depth perception on my part.A team of researchers led by Alan Nathan at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, and Terry Bahill at the University of Arizona, Tucson, will soon be publishing ...
Posted by Edward Willett at 21:50, April 14th, 2008 under Blog, Science Columns |
A Baltimore Oriole watches the ball come over the plate in a game against Toronto on a sunny Sunday in August in the Skydome (er, Rogers Place...whatever).More photos
here.
Posted by Edward Willett at 4:20, October 6th, 2007 under Blog |
The Subway Series is not, as a non-sports-fan might be forgiven for thinking, an exciting new lineup of sandwiches from a popular restaurant chain. It is, instead, this year's World Series of baseball between the New York Yankees and the New York Mets, and even if you're not interested in watching New Yorkers battle each other, you can always watch the games and think about science, instead (assuming the series isn't over by the time you read this, which, based on the first couple of games, it probably is).
Baseball is essentially a battle between the pitcher and the batter, and scientifically, it's a battle the batter should never win.
It takes a 90-mph fastball (since ...
Posted by Edward Willett at 11:28, October 24th, 2000 under Blog, Columns, Science Columns |
It's World Series time again, and it's shaping up to be an exciting one--but for me, nothing can equal the excitement of the 1909 Series.
I remember it like it was yesterday. The smell of the grass, the roar of the crowd, as I made my way to the mound to start for the Detroit Tigers...
What's that? I'm too young to have pitched in the 1909 World Series? Well, I dare you to look it up. 1909. Detroit Tigers. Ed Willett.
See? I'm older than I look.
The game has changed a lot since then, but it's still a duel between pitcher and ...
Posted by Edward Willett at 11:23, October 20th, 1997 under Blog, Columns, Science Columns |
I'm lousy at baseball. Fly balls fly right over me, line drives make me duck, and I can't run the bases worth a darn--but that's all right, since I seldom hit the ball.
So to write this column about the science of pitching, I turned to an expert: Robert K. Adair, Sterling Professor of Physics at Yale University, whose 1990 book The Physics of Baseball provided all the information I needed. If you're a serious baseball fan (or a serious physics fan), I highly recommend it.
As every batter knows, the baseball does not follow a perfectly straight line between the pitcher and the plate (more's the pity). In fact, the pitcher ...
Posted by Edward Willett at 11:26, November 8th, 1993 under Blog, Columns |
I'm lousy at baseball. Fly balls fly right over me, line drives make me duck, and I can't run the bases worth a darn--but that's all right, since I seldom hit the ball.
So to write this column about the science of pitching, I turned to an expert: Robert K. Adair, Sterling Professor of Physics at Yale University, whose 1990 book The Physics of Baseball provided all the information I needed. If you're a serious baseball fan (or a serious physics fan), I highly recommend it.
As every batter knows, the baseball does not follow a perfectly straight line between the pitcher and the plate (more's the pity). In fact, the pitcher has a number of ...
Posted by Edward Willett at 18:55, October 11th, 1993 under Blog, Columns, Science Columns |