Edward Willett

Archives

Insight into the theory of mind

[podcast]http://edwardwillett.com/wp-content/upLoads//2009/07/Theory-of-Mind.mp3[/podcast] This shouldn’t come as a surprise to anyone who’s been paying attention, but in addition to writing nonfiction, I also write fiction—specifically, science fiction and fantasy. Now, the writing of fiction is a very odd thing, in that it involves the making up of characters: people who don’t really exist, but for whom the illusion of existence is created by the words the author puts on the page. Quite often, these people are very different from the author. I recently interviewed renowned Canadian science fiction writer Robert J. Sawyer for FreeLance, the magazine of the Saskatchewan Writers’ Guild. The main character in his latest book, Wake, is a blind teenage girl, Caitlin Decter. Now, although Sawyer can draw on some experience at ...

Posted by Edward Willett at 10:27, July 1st, 2009 under Blog, Columns, Science Columns | 2 Comments »

Are cognitive shortcuts making us fat?

[podcast]http://edwardwillett.com/wp-content/upLoads//2009/06/Cognitive-Shortcuts-to-Obesity.mp3[/podcast] When we think about how we make decisions, we tend to imagine that we consider the facts of a situation carefully and logically, in a straightforward, step-by-step manner. But that process is, indeed, imaginary. The truth is that our brains prefer to do as little actual thinking as possible. They like shortcuts—and sometimes those shortcuts can get us into trouble. Take, for instance, what psychologists at the University of Pennsylvania call "Unit Bias," which, they say, “causes people to ignore vital, obvious information in their decision-making process, points to a fundamental flaw in the modern, evolved mind, and may also play a role in the American population's 30 years of weight gain.” The researchers conducted several studies with college-age participants. In one, the ...

Posted by Edward Willett at 20:50, June 17th, 2009 under Blog, Columns, Science Columns | Comment now »

A universal theory of humour

[podcast]http://www.edwardwillett.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/A Universal Theory of Humour.mp3[/podcast] I am a very funny man. I have been told so, so it must be true. You can tell how funny I am by reading my very funny writing. Like this paragraph. This paragraph is very funny. It must be because I am a very funny man. I have been told so, so it must be true. Why we find things funny has long been a matter of contention in the scientific world, probably because humor itself is so subjective. I think the preceding paragraph is funny. You might disagree. But now I can trump your disagreement with science: that paragraph is funny because it’s based on the surprise repetition of patterns. Until recently, theories of humour have ...

Posted by Edward Willett at 11:49, April 13th, 2009 under Science Columns | Comment now »

Dare to doodle!

[podcast]http://edwardwillett.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/doodling.mp3[/podcast] Hi! My name is Ed, and I am a doodler. I have doodled my way through countless classes, mounds of monotonous meetings, scads of sonorous sermons. My teachers and others have looked at me askance over the years. But no more! I, and all who doodle with me, have at last been vindicated by psychologist Jackie Andrade of England’s University of Plymouth. “What Does Doodling Do?” asks her latest study, the results of which were just published in Applied Cognitive Psychology. The answer? Doodling, far from distracting people from the monotony du jour, actually helps focus their minds: doodlers remember what they just heard better than non-doodlers. For her study, Andrade asked 40 participants, ranging in age from 18 to 55, to listen to ...

Posted by Edward Willett at 12:54, March 2nd, 2009 under Science Columns | 3 Comments »

The hazards of bad jokes

How often have you heard someone say, “I just can’t tell a joke?”How often have you then heard the person who made that self-deprecating claim attempt to do just that?According to recent research, if you truly believe the former, you should stick to your guns, because telling a bad joke in a social situation can actually be hazardous.And by bad jokes, we’re not talking about dirty jokes, racist jokes, or ethnic jokes. We’re talking about jokes that just aren’t that funny. Specifically, in fact, this joke:“What did the big chimney say to the little chimney?”“Nothing. Chimneys can’t talk.”It was this joke (discovered by Googling “bad jokes”) that Nancy ...

Posted by Edward Willett at 10:49, February 17th, 2009 under Science Columns | Comment now »

Let’s not rush into anything

In movies and TV shows, people fall in love and into bed (or the other way around) with amazing speed. In musicals, it’s even worse: all it takes is a single song.In real life, though, although one hears of whirlwind romances and sudden marriages (often followed by whirlwind separations and sudden divorces) courtship is often a very drawn-out affair.And now scientists have developed a mathematical model to explain why.One of the lead researchers, Professor Robert Seymour of University College London, points out extended courtships are common to a number of species--but, of course, it’s the human application that most interests us self-centered homo sapiens.Says Seymour, “Human courtship...can involve a sequence of dinners, ...

Posted by Edward Willett at 18:11, January 19th, 2009 under Science Columns | Comment now »

The psychology of procrastination

Some people think I have good time management skills because I work at home and yet manage to crank out a lot of words of one sort or another.Some people don’t know what they’re talking about.The fact is, my usual working pattern is procrastinate, procrastinate, procrastinate, panic panic panic!, rinse and repeat. I, in fact, put the “pro” in procrastinate. Take this column. I’ve started writing it a good hour later than I should have...because first I had to do other stuff. You know, like make coffee. And read email. Post on Twitter. Check Facebook. Shoot down airplanes over the Pacific...Why do people procrastinate? One of the leading experts on the subject ...

Posted by Edward Willett at 18:31, January 12th, 2009 under Science Columns | 6 Comments »

The fad cycle

Here’s a fearless prediction for 2009: sometime, somewhere, something is going to become a hot new fad.It’s a cycle as old as...well, as old as me, anyway, and I suspect a good deal older. Since I was a teenager in the 1970s, I think in terms of Rubik Cubes, platform shoes, bell-bottoms and mood rings.Today I’m so far out of it, pop-culture wise, I’d hesitate to even mention a 2008 fad for fear it’s already last-year’s thing. (Although, since this column appears on New Year’s Eve, I guess you could say any 2008 fad is last-year’s thing.)Perhaps you have fallen for a fad yourself, once in a while. I would say that I never ...

Posted by Edward Willett at 18:29, December 29th, 2008 under Science Columns | 1 Comment »

The epidemiology of happiness

'Tis the season...Oh, no, wait, I can't use THAT opening again.Um, how about...At this time of year, there's a lot of talk about joy and happiness. There's also a lot of talk about influenza. You might think them unrelated, but in fact they share one very interesting characteristic: they're both contagious.If contagious happiness sounds familiar, you're probably remembering the 1968 movie comedy "What's So Bad About Feeling Good?", starring George Peppard and Mary Tyler Moore.Or maybe I'm the only one who remembers it.Anyway, in the movie, a toucan carrying a happiness-causing virus is smuggled into New York City. The virus infects so many people that that the city faces economic ...

Posted by Edward Willett at 17:36, December 8th, 2008 under Science Columns | 1 Comment »

A bit about bias

A Bit About Bias Now that both the Canadian and the American elections are over, it’s time to ask ourselves a serious question: How on Earth could so many people be so pig-headed and blind as to have disagreed with you and me (I’m assuming, of course, that you agree with me) about the best people to vote for, when it was blatantly obvious that our candidates were superior in every way? Blatant bias and serious stupidity, obviously. No doubt fueled by the media. After all, we all know how biased they are. Alas, say psychologists contacted for a recent Philadelphia Inquirer article on the subject, we’re all biased. And one of the most basic ways in which we’re biased is ...

Posted by Edward Willett at 20:57, November 10th, 2008 under Blog, Science Columns | 1 Comment »