Edward Willett

Archives

What I Just Read: Bone Song

Bone Song by John Meaney was one of the books included in the bag-o'-free-books handed me at World Fantasy Convention. I liked the cover and the premise sounded interesting, so I decided to give it a shot.I'm glad I did. It's an interesting mixture of police procedural and gothic horror, with a pretty straightforward conspiracy-reaching-to-the-highest-levels-investigated-by-team-of-maverick-cops story (you know, one of those) that gains its interest from the macabre world Meaney has created, where power is generated by either corpses being magically fused inside massive underground reactors or teams of slack-jawed, mind-and-body-synchronized bald-headed children, depending on which country you're in, and cars, furniture and elevators are as ...

Posted by Edward Willett at 15:50, November 19th, 2008 under Blog | Comment now »

What I Just Read: City of Ashes

I actually finished City of Ashes, the second book in the Mortal Instruments series by Cassandra Clare, the week before last, but then I headed out of town to join the Canadian Chamber Choir and haven't had a minute to post about it until now.It continues to hold my interest with plot twists, great action scenes, and lots of humor. I still get Buffy-vibes off it, but that's not a bad thing, necessarily--I liked Buffy.I guess the other thing it reminds me of a bit are the Dresden Files books by Jim Butcher. Again, not a bad thing....

Posted by Edward Willett at 21:41, October 29th, 2008 under Blog | Comment now »

Scientific evidence reading fiction is good for you AND for society

From the Globe and Mail:A group of Toronto researchers have compiled a body of evidence showing that bookworms have exceptionally strong people skills. Their years of research - summed up in the current issue of New Scientist magazine - has shown readers of narrative fiction scored higher on tests of empathy and social acumen than those who read non-fiction texts. And follow-up research showed that reading fiction may help fine-tune these skills: People assigned to read a New Yorker short story did better on social reasoning tests than those who read an essay from the same magazine. Those benefits, researchers say, may be because fiction acts as a type of simulator. Reading about ...

Posted by Edward Willett at 18:05, July 10th, 2008 under Blog | Comment now »

Why do I read science fiction?

It comes down to both nature and nurture, says Carol Pinchefsky in Orson Scott Card's Intergalactic Medicine Show:Paul Allen, a reader of science fiction and a practicing clinical psychotherapist for 22 years, says my temperament predisposes me to a love of science fiction. Each of us has a temperament, that is, a part of our personality that may or may not be genetically based. A quick Myers-Briggs test has informed me that I'm a Thinking iNtuitive (NT), that is, a "Rational." According to the Keirsey Temperament website, "Rationals are very scarce, comprising as little as 5 to 7 percent of the population." Allen says, "NTs are non-conformist critical thinkers. The NTs idolize the ...

Posted by Edward Willett at 16:29, August 9th, 2007 under Blog | Comment now »

"Bad books are an essential part of life"

Praise for bad books from The New York Times:Bad books are an essential part of life, as entertaining and indispensable as bad clothing (ironic polyester shirts), bad music (John Tesh at Red Rocks, Phil Collins anywhere), bad trends (metrosexuality, not using toilet paper for a year in order to “help” the environment) and bad politicians (take your pick).****Bad books fall into three broad categories: the stupid, the meta-stupid and the immoral. Each has its own inimitable charms. Stupid books range from anything with the word “rapture” in the title to investment guides linking the yield curve with the teachings of Nostradamus. Meta-stupid books try to explain how to hold better meetings or motivate slackers ...

Posted by Edward Willett at 14:47, May 8th, 2007 under Blog | Comment now »

Do you lie about what you read?

Apparently the Brits do:People once said ‘you are what you eat’ but it appears the phrase has been hijacked by image-conscious Brits to state ‘you are what you read.’So suggests new research from the Museums, Libraries and Archives Council, which found almost half of people lie about their literary credentials.Joining in conversation motivated 40% of people to fib about reading classics like Jane Eyre, while an equal number said they’ve cited such heavyweight novels to appear more intelligent.So-called ‘book snobbery’ is most likely to come from adults aged 18-21, but these youngsters, ironically, are the likeliest to get caught out....

Posted by Edward Willett at 21:04, February 8th, 2007 under Blog | 2 Comments »

What does a writer owe his readers?

I've been reading very interesting thread over at Paperback Writer about what an author "owes" a reader.Paperback Writer wrote:I don't know what, if anything, writers actually "owe" readers. I always feel a responsibility to do my best work for the reader; that goes without saying. No one can write something that makes everyone happy. As to what ends up in print, I generally only sell what has (in the publisher's opinion) the greatest chance of selling well, or what has already sold well in the past. (snip)I'm curious to hear what other writers and readers think. Do you believe the writer owes the reader anything? If so, what, and why? ...

Posted by Edward Willett at 5:49, January 8th, 2007 under Blog | 1 Comment »

Reading and signing reminder

Just a reminder for any readers in the Regina area: I'll be reading and signing my book A Safe and Prosperous Future: 100 years of engineering and geoscience achievements in Saskatchewan, tonight (Tuesday, December 19) at 7 p.m. at the Book & Brier Patch in Regina.Since my wife can't even be there, it would be nice if someone was...

Posted by Edward Willett at 16:50, December 19th, 2006 under Blog | Comment now »

The 50 most significant SF&F Books, 1953-2002

I've seen the following list of The 50 Most Significant SF & F Books published between 1953 and 2002, originally from the Science Fiction Book Club, then posted by Lou Anders on his blog, in various places, but hadn't gotten around to doing anything with it until I saw it on Amy Nelson-Mile's Books, Words, and Writing this morning. The idea is that you bold the ones you’ve read, strike-out the ones you hated, italicize those you started but never finished, and put an asterisk beside the ones you loved.So here goes:1. The Lord of the Rings, J.R.R. Tolkien*2. The Foundation Trilogy, Isaac Asimov3. Dune, Frank Herbert*4. Stranger in a Strange ...

Posted by Edward Willett at 16:31, December 3rd, 2006 under Blog | 1 Comment »

The 50 most significant SFF Books, 1953-2002

pI've seen the following list of a href="http://www.louanders.com/2006/11/50-most-significant-sff-books.html"The 50 Most Significant SF F Books/a published between 1953 and 2002, originally from the Science Fiction Book Club, then posted by a href="http://www.louanders.com/Bio.htm"Lou Anders/a on his a href="http://www.louanders.com/"blog/a, in various places, but hadn't gotten around to doing anything with it until I saw it on Amy Nelson-Mile's ema href="http://www.amynelsonmile.net/booksblog/"Books, Words, and Writing/a/em this morning. The idea is that you bold the ones you’ve read, strike-out the ones you hated, italicize those you started but never finished, and put an asterisk beside the ones you loved./ppSo here goes:br /br /1. strongThe Lord of the Rings/strong, J.R.R. Tolkien*br /2. emThe Foundation Trilogy/em, Isaac Asimovbr /3. strongDune/strong, Frank Herbert*br /4. strongStranger in a Strange ...

Posted by Edward Willett at 16:31, December 3rd, 2006 under Blog | Comment now »