Edward Willett

Archives

A review of the filmed-in-Saskatchewan Tideland

Here's the first review I've seen of Terry Gillam's Tideland, shot in Saskatchewan (as you can see in the photo that accompanies the article, which was clearly taken in the Qu'Appelle Valley). In fact, a great deal of it was shot across the street from the condo we lived in until last October, at the Canada-Saskatchewan Production Studios.Here's the opening paragraph of the review. I'm not entirely sure the reviewer cared for the movie:The newest Terry Gilliam movie is best described as nightmarish. With no particular point, the end of the film evokes relief and embarrassment, as if you have just finished witnessing Gilliam pass an enormous kidney stone. One feels the urge to ...

Posted by Edward Willett at 15:24, February 16th, 2007 under Blog | Comment now »

Disney is bringing back hand-drawn animation

This makes me happy.

Posted by Edward Willett at 13:11, February 9th, 2007 under Blog | Comment now »

Old sci-fi movies got it right!

It used to be a staple of B-movie science fiction involving travel in outer space or landing on another planet: the meteor shower, rocks flying through space and threatening our heroes with explosive decompression (see yesterday's post!) or worse.Turns out, they may have been on to something.A recent episode of The Backyardigans (our TV is locked on the preschool Treehouse channel, since we have a five-year-old) had our singing kid-whatever-they-ares threatened by a meteor shower. Fortunately, they had a meteor umbrella on their rover.Maybe NASA should watch more kid-TV!

Posted by Edward Willett at 22:09, December 1st, 2006 under Blog | Comment now »

Movie monster biology

Not long ago I wrote an article emphasizing that science fiction is, first and foremost, fiction, and that a little fudging of the science for the sake of the story is expected and accepted.Having said that, however, I must also admit that nothing warms the cockles of my heart (what exactly is a cockle, anyway?) like a big juicy article pointing out silly science in movies, and that’s just what Michael C. LaBarbera, a biology professor at the University of Chicago, has provided.His article (much too long to go through in detail: you can read the whole thing here) starts off with a discussion of size.Giant critters have been a mainstay of ...

Posted by Edward Willett at 18:14, November 14th, 2006 under Blog, Science Columns | Comment now »

The Biology of B-Movie Monsters

I can't believe I hadn't come across this until now (but then, the World Wide Web is a rather large place [if it's a place at all (and how many paranthetical [like this] statements can one put in a single sentence, anyway?)]): Michael C. LaBarbera, a University of Chicago biologist, has taken a scientific look at The Biology of B-Movie Monsters. (Via MedGadget.) Now, not too long ago I talked about the silliness of using science to disprove the existence of vampires and ghosts. So why do I like this one? Because vampires and ghosts are supernatural--that is, they are conceived to exist outside of nature and therefore are not subject to nature's laws, but rather to a different ...

Posted by Edward Willett at 21:36, November 6th, 2006 under Blog, Columns, Science Columns | Comment now »

Bad movie science

It will probably come as no surprise to you that when Hollywood tackles scientific topics, it almost always gets them wrong. But as Sid Perkins describes in a recent article in Science News Online, some scientists and teachers are using movie science to teach science and promote an interest in science. There are innumerable examples of bad movie science, but Perkins focuses on two recent examples, beginning with the would-be blockbuster The Day After Tomorrow. In The Day After Tomorrow, global warming melts so much polar ice that the flood of cold fresh water interferes with the ocean's thermohaline circulation, which warms the North Atlantic (and with it, Europe). In the movie, the collapse of this circulation triggers a new ice age within weeks. Alas, about the time ...

Posted by Edward Willett at 17:09, October 26th, 2004 under Blog, Columns, Science Columns | Comment now »

Synthespians: artificial actors

In the movie The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers, one of the best performances is turned in by an actor who isn't entirely real. Gollum, the hobbit-like creature who once possessed the One Ring and would do anything to possess it again is the latest and most-impressive-to-date example of a "synthespian"--a computer-generated actor. He's hardly alone. The film's massive Battle of Helm's Deep, featuring tens of thousands of combatants, is fought almost entirely by synthespians. Gollum is amazingly lifelike; yet, with his emaciated body, big head and enormous eyes, he looks like nothing ever seen on Earth. He certainly doesn't look like Andy Serkis, the Shakespearean-trained actor who spent 2 1/2 years being ...

Posted by Edward Willett at 23:18, January 7th, 2003 under Blog, Columns, Science Columns | Comment now »

Stupid movie physics

  The season of the movie blockbuster is upon us, and that means it's time once again to ask the question: what planet do the people in movies live on? Judging by the physics displayed, it's not this one. In our world, for example, you cannot outrun the fireball of an exploding bomb down the hallway of a building and leap through a handily placed window just before it engulfs you. And that's just one example. For others, I turned to the Intuitor Insultingly Stupid Movie Physics Web site, where a list of the most common examples of stupid movie physics is maintained. First: sparking bullets. In movies, bullets which strike other objects, especially steel objects, create sparks or flashes of ...

Posted by Edward Willett at 6:07, May 14th, 2002 under Blog, Columns, Science Columns | Comment now »

Mad science

We've all seen mad scientists in the movies, hair standing on end, shouting, "They laughed! They said I was crazy! But we'll see who has the last laugh now! Hahahahahahahaha!" Havoc ensues until torch-carrying villagers burn the laboratory. The real-life counterparts to these fictional mad scientists are the scientists pursuing theories that mainstream science considers, if not crazy, at least too implausible to take seriously. Sometimes these "mad scientists" are right. Consider meteorologist Alfred Wegener. In 1912, after noticing that the coastlines of Africa and South America fit together as though they were pieces from the same jigsaw puzzle, he suggested the continents had once been joined, but had drifted ...

Posted by Edward Willett at 11:08, May 29th, 2001 under Blog, Columns, Science Columns | Comment now »

The Saskatchewan Film Pool: bringing filmmakers together

It's not easy being an independent filmmaker. Of all the art forms, film is one of the most expensive, requiring specialized equipment and facilities. But filmmaking is like any other complicated endeavor: it gets easier when you pool resources with other individuals involved in the same pursuit. That's the philosophy behind the Saskatchewan Filmpool Cooperative. Much like the Neutral Ground Gallery, which I wrote about a few weeks ago, it's a non-profit, artist-run centre. It provides workshops, equipment and funding to independent filmmakers across Saskatchewan, and through its monthly bulletin, Infoshot, and its three-times-a-year magazine Splice, helps build a sense of community. Shane Eason, member services coordinator for the Filmpool, says the cooperative currently has ...

Posted by Edward Willett at 17:51, April 12th, 2001 under Art Columns, Blog, Columns | Comment now »