Archives
In my 1999 young adult science fiction novel Andy Nebula: Interstellar Rock Star, I postulated a future in which the hit-making machinery of the music industry has become a science, where computers are able to determine what songs, and what singers, are sure to be the next big thing.
In the book, a kid names Kit gets plucked from his hand-to-mouth existence busking on the streets of a nasty little city on a nasty little planet and turned into Andy Nebula, the next “Sensation Single,” all on the strength of a computer’s analysis of what teens want.
Looks like I might have been on to something. A new study from Emory ...
Posted by Edward Willett at 14:33, June 14th, 2011 under Blog, Columns, Science Columns |
[podcast]http://edwardwillett.com/wp-content/upLoads//2011/05/Unrealistic-Expectations.mp3[/podcast]
A few years ago (35 still counts as a few, right?) I was valedictorian for my high school class. This entailed making a speech. Since the theme of our class was “Climb Every Mountain” (why, yes, we had produced The Sound of Music that year; how did you guess?), my speech was based on an extended metaphor: high school as a place of mountain-climbing instruction.
I’d love to tell you exactly what I said, but I think the paper I wrote the speech on crumbled to dust long ago. Still, I’m pretty sure I expressed optimism about the future and said something about “scaling peaks” and “reaching for the sky” and ...
Posted by Edward Willett at 12:40, May 24th, 2011 under Blog, Columns, Science Columns |
[podcast]http://edwardwillett.com/wp-content/upLoads//2011/02/The-Thinking-Cap.mp3[/podcast]
You know, it’s not easy being a writer.
Oh, I know, it doesn’t rank up there with, say, coal miner in physical difficulty or neurosurgeon in mental difficulty, but where it probably has it over both of them is in creative difficulty: the pressure to constantly come up with something new.
Heck, as a science fiction and fantasy writer, I’m expected to create entire worlds, whole solar systems, mythical creatures and believable characters out of nothing more than my own brain cells.
Wouldn’t it be great if there were some way to artificially stimulate creativity?
Turns out, there may be.
In a
paper published earlier this month in PLoS One, an online ...
Posted by Edward Willett at 10:22, February 15th, 2011 under Blog, Columns, Science Columns |
[podcast]http://edwardwillett.com/wp-content/upLoads//2010/03/Morally-Malignant-Magnets.mp3[/podcast]
One of the things that distinguishes humans from animals is moral judgment, our ability to judge other people’s actions in terms of our own sense of right and wrong.
Our moral judgment feels so integral to who we are, so much a part of our personality, that it’s a bit disturbing to discover, as MIT researchers reported this week, that it can be disrupted by magnets.
Rebecca Saxe, an assistant professor of brain and cognitive sciences at MIT, has focused her research on social cognition: how we interpret other people’s thoughts. She wants to understand how the brain gives rise to things like moral judgments, belief systems and language.
The challenge, of course, is that we have no way to observe people’s thoughts ...
Posted by Edward Willett at 13:47, March 31st, 2010 under Blog, Columns, Science Columns |
[podcast]http://edwardwillett.com/wp-content/upLoads//2009/12/Why-We-Overeat.mp3[/podcast]
Put on a few extra pounds over Christmas? Wonder why you feel compelled to eat half a box of chocolates half an hour after finishing your second plate of turkey, dressing, mashed potatoes and gravy? Feel a little guilty?
Well, new research offers clues to one of the most baffling aspects of the eternal battle of the bulge: why we keep eating even when we’re full.
Short version: blame your brain.
When you’re hungry, food looks more appealing than when you’re not: hence the old adage about never shopping on an empty stomach.
Previous research has suggested that ghrelin, a hormone the body produces when it’s short of calories, may act on the brain to trigger this behavior. Now new research suggests that this ...
Posted by Edward Willett at 12:16, December 30th, 2009 under Blog, Columns, Science Columns |
[podcast]http://edwardwillett.com/wp-content/upLoads//2009/11/Dreaming.mp3[/podcast]
Why do we dream?
You’d think we’d know by now. Everyone dreams, and people have been fascinated by dreams throughout recorded history. But scientifically, their origin and importance remain uncertain. Do they serve some vital psychological or physiological function? Or are they just meaningless accidents of our brain’s wiring?
A few years ago, Finnish psychologist Antti Revonsuo theorized that dreams evolved as a way to rehearse threatening situations.
Silvio Scarone of the Universita degli Studi de Milano in Milan, Italy, explains it this way: “The environment in which the human brain evolved included frequent dangerous events that posed threats to human reproduction. These would have been a serious selection pressure on ancestral human populations and would have fully activated ...
Posted by Edward Willett at 14:34, November 12th, 2009 under Blog, Columns, Science Columns |
[podcast]http://edwardwillett.com/wp-content/upLoads//2009/10/Gelotophobia.mp3[/podcast]
It’s getting on toward Christmas, which means A Charlie Brown Christmas will soon be on TV...and we’ll once again get to watch Lucy give her nickel’s worth of psychiatric advice to Charlie Brown, listing all the phobias he could be subject to.
One she won’t list is gelotophobia, which, though it sounds like it means a fear of Italian ice cream (and, yes, everyone who writes about it makes that same joke), actually means a fear of being laughed at. More: those with gelotophobia find it difficult or impossible to distinguish between playful teasing and ridicule. To them, all laughter is aggressive. Not surprisingly, this can cause enormous problems in their social relationships.
Lots of other people don’t have a phobia, but ...
Posted by Edward Willett at 12:23, October 29th, 2009 under Blog, Columns, Science Columns |
[podcast]http://edwardwillett.com/wp-content/upLoads//2009/09/The-Thrill-of-the-Chase.mp3[/podcast]
I had a hard time getting started on this column. See, as I was calling up the items I’d starred in Google Reader as possible topics, I thought it wouldn’t hurt to do a quick search for new reviews of my latest novel. And then I thought, well, as long as I’m online, maybe I’ll just skim through some blogs...and maybe check Facebook...and...
Well, you get the idea. Fact is, you’re lucky to be getting this column at all.
Which is ironic, because my jumping-off point is an article from Slate, written by Emily Yoffe, titled “
Seeking: How the brain hard-wires us to love Google, Twitter, and texting. And why that’s dangerous.”
There’s no doubt that the seeking out of information ...
Posted by Edward Willett at 16:16, September 9th, 2009 under Blog, Columns, Science Columns |
[podcast]http://edwardwillett.com/wp-content/upLoads//2009/07/Theory-of-Mind.mp3[/podcast]
This shouldn’t come as a surprise to anyone who’s been paying attention, but in addition to writing nonfiction, I also write fiction—specifically, science fiction and fantasy.
Now, the writing of fiction is a very odd thing, in that it involves the making up of characters: people who don’t really exist, but for whom the illusion of existence is created by the words the author puts on the page.
Quite often, these people are very different from the author. I recently interviewed renowned Canadian science fiction writer Robert J. Sawyer for FreeLance, the magazine of the Saskatchewan Writers’ Guild. The main character in his latest book, Wake, is a blind teenage girl, Caitlin Decter. Now, although Sawyer can draw on some experience at ...
Posted by Edward Willett at 10:27, July 1st, 2009 under Blog, Columns, Science Columns |
[podcast]http://edwardwillett.com/wp-content/upLoads//2009/06/Talk-to-the-right-ear.mp3[/podcast]
If someone approaches you from your left side and makes a request, are you more or less likely to grant that request than if he approaches you from your right side?
If you’re thinking, “What kind of a stupid question is that?”, and you think it would be an equally stupid question no matter which ear it was spoken into, then you probably haven’t heard of something called the “natural expression of hemispheric asymmetries,” and more specifically something called “the right-ear advantage.”
Basically, it boils down to this: scientists have known for a long time that humans have a preference for listening to verbal input with their right ears.
Not only that, if they hear something with both ears, they’ll pay more attention ...
Posted by Edward Willett at 12:08, June 24th, 2009 under Blog, Columns, Science Columns |